Dynamics of Male Circumcision Practices in Northwest Tanzania
SOORI NNKO, MA*;†; ROBERT WASHIJA, BA†; MARK URASSA, MSc†; J. TIES BOERMA,
MD, PhD‡
From the *National Institute for Medical Research, the †Tanzania-Netherlands
Project to Support AIDS Control in Mwanza Region, Mwanza, Tanzania; and the
‡Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, and
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES 2001;28:214-218
Background:
Methods: Data from a factory workers study and a rural cohort study in
northwest Tanzania were used to analyze the levels and determinants of male
circumcision status and assess the reliability of self-reported data.
Qualitative data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were
obtained to ascertain norms and values in relation to male circumcision.
Results: Male circumcision has become more popular in recent years, and 21%
of 3,491 men reported themselves as circumcised. An increase in circumcision
rates was observed in the rural cohort study during 1994 to 1997, though
reporting inconsistencies are common. Circumcision rates were higher among
men with higher levels of education and in Muslim men. Men are often
circumcised in their late teens or twenties. The reasons for the increasing
popularity of circumcision were investigated in group discussions and
in-depth interviews. The most frequently mentioned reason was
health-related; circumcision was thought to enhance penile hygiene, reduce
sexually transmitted disease incidence, and improve sexually transmitted
disease cure rates.
Conclusion: Male circumcision is becoming more popular among a traditionally
noncircumcising ethnic group in Tanzania, especially in urban areas and
among boys who have attended secondary schools.
While studying the risk of HIV infection among circumcised and
noncircumcised men in northwest Tanzania, it was observed that traditional
patterns of circumcision were changing.6 A substantial number of men
belonging to traditionally noncircumcising tribes have been circumcised.
This paper describes these changes and presents an attempt to understand why
they are taking place.
Methods:
Quantitative data were derived from two sources. The first source is intake
data from a cohort study among factory workers in Mwanza town,13 which began
in 1991. These data refer to the period from 1991 to 1994 (988 Sukuma men).
The second source are data from a rural population study in one
administrative ward (Kisesa), 20 km east of the regional capital Mwanza and
5 km from the factory cohort study site. Since 1994, this population has
been followed up through demographic surveillance and epidemiologic surveys
to assess the effects of community interventions on sexual behavior and HIV
and AIDS, and the impact of the epidemic. Population-based surveys were
conducted in 1994 to 1995 and in 1996 to 1997 among all men (and women) 15
to 44 years in Kisesa ward.14 This analysis combines data from the male
factory workers cohort study and the rural study. The studies also provide
an opportunity to assess the quality of self-reported circumcision data.
In the rural area, 96% of the men were Sukuma, whereas in the urban factory
population, 63% were Sukuma. Only members of the Sukuma tribe were included.
In the urban area and the rural trading center, circumcision rates were
several times higher than in the rural population.
Qualitative research used two methods. Focus group discussions were held
with 13 groups, each consisting of five to eight participants: schoolboys
(three groups), middle-aged men (two groups), older men (five groups) and
women (three groups). All but one of the group discussions were held in
rural settings, including a fishing village, a roadside settlement, and a
typical rural community with little influence from outsiders. In addition,
16 in-depth interviews were conducted with schoolboys, adult men, health
workers, a traditional healer, and a religious leader. In-depth interviews
and focus group discussions took place in the local setting and were carried
out by experienced project field staff in Swahili or, if necessary, the
local language. All discussions were tape recorded, transcribed, and
translated into English. Both the Swahili text and the verbatim-translated
English text were consulted during the analysis.
Results:
Table 1. Male Circumcision Rates Among Sukuma Men by Background
Characteristics With Univariate and Adjusted Odds Ratios and 95% CI
(Northwest Tanzania, 1994–1997)
Not surprisingly, the proportion of men circumcised was much higher among
Muslim men than among non-Muslim men; however, 26% of Muslim Sukuma men had
not been circumcised. Christian men had higher circumcision rates than men
of other religions, including traditional religions. Circumcision is more
common among the more educated; less than 10% of men with none or 1 to 4
years of formal education were circumcised, whereas 23% of men with 5 to 7
years primary school and 57% of Sukuma men with more than 8 years of
education (implying at least some secondary education) had been circumcised.
The last two columns of Table 1 present results of a logistic regression
model that includes all four variables. Controlling for other variables did
not alter the relation between circumcision and the background variables,
but the magnitude of some effects decreased. The most important change was
the reduction of the effect of urban and roadside residence compared with
rural residence after controlling for all other variables. In particular,
controlling for religion and education resulted in reduction of the effects
of urban and roadside residence compared with the unadjusted model. The
higher rates of circumcision in urban areas and, to a lesser extent roadside
settlements, can partly be explained by the large number of Muslims and men
with secondary education that reside in these places, compared with the
rural areas.
The two rounds of the rural Kisesa survey in 1994 to 1995 and 1996 to 97
showed an increase in circumcision rates among Sukuma men from 16.8% to
19.7% (number of participants: 2,606 and 2,776, respectively). The increase
could not be attributed to changes in the age structure, residential pattern
or survey attendance, or religious denomination. However, the analysis of
1,782 men who were present in both rounds showed that inconsistency in
self-reported circumcision status between the first and second round was
common (Table 2). Among 243 men who said they had been circumcised in the
first survey, 65 (26.8%) said they were not circumcised during the second
survey, which occurred 2 years later. Likewise, a sizable proportion of
circumcised men reported themselves as not circumcised during the first
round but circumcised at the second round. Of the 162 men who said they were
circumcised at the second round, only 40 had been circumcised during the
last 2 years (between the two survey rounds). If we exclude all men with
inconsistent circumcision status, the incidence of circumcision during the
2-year period is 2.8% (40/1417).
Table 2. Consistency of Self-Reported Circumcision Status Among 1782 Male
Respondents Attending Two Rural Survey Rounds (Tanzania, 1994–1995 and
1996–1997)
Reasons for Changing Practices
Traditionally, the Sukuma men are not circumcised and there are no customary
norms or rituals attached to the procedure. In the past it was shameful for
a Sukuma man to be circumcised, as evidenced by the presence of a derogatory
word for a circumcised man in Sukuma language (njilwa). The four possible
factors contributing to the present popularization of circumcision
practices—health, sexual pleasure, religion, and ethnic mixing—emerged from
the in-depth interviews and group discussions.
In all focus group discussions, the association between circumcision and
STDs was spontaneously mentioned. Circumcised men were considered less
susceptible to STDs, and several informants claimed that men might
circumcise to prevent contracting STDs. A young man in group discussion
stated, “There are many reasons why it is important for the youths to
circumcise. One is that it protects them from getting diseases. When you are
not circumcised you can easily acquire STDs.” A woman attending an antenatal
clinic focus group discussion stated that, “Uncircumcised men contract STDs
more easily than the circumcised ones.” Finally, a participant in a
discussion with school girls claimed, “It is very easy and common for
uncircumcised man to contract STD from an infected woman.”
Almost all groups mentioned that STDs are more severe among uncircumcised
men and that ulcers heal faster in circumcised men. Some claimed that Sukuma
men tend to go for circumcision after contracting genital ulcers to
facilitate the healing process. Also mentioned, though less frequently, was
that noncircumcised men would be more infectious. A schoolgirl stated during
a group discussion that, “An uncircumcised boy who has had sex with STD
infected woman can easily infect you; if he proposes having sex with me I
will definitely reject. He is dangerous. He may infect me as well.”
There was a strong belief that the foreskin creates favorable conditions for
the growth and transmission of STDs, notably by maintaining high
temperature. People also claimed that the foreskin secretes a dirty fluid
that acts as a favorable medium for the growth of diseases. Male
circumcision was also considered to enhance penile hygiene. The foreskin
also may potentially be considered a source of bad smell. These points are
illustrated by statements made by participants in different focus group
discussions: “... when uncircumcised we keep a lot of dirt” (village youth);
“... it helps to avoid the dirt under the foreskin”(adult man, rural
village); “... circumcision facilitates the avoidance of the bad smell from
the dirt that forms under the foreskin” (older man, fishing village); “...
when you have the foreskin removed, it saves you the trouble of washing
every time. This is the fact, and if you stop washing for, say, two days
there will be a bad smell. But if you are circumcised, you need not bother”
(adult man).
In focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with young people it was
mentioned that circumcision enhances the sexual pleasure of both partners.
They believed that it reduces friction during sexual intercourse and
increases the woman’s sexual pleasure. Youth also expressed that the
foreskin reduced sexual pleasure for men. Some likened the presence of a
foreskin to wearing a condom: “Some boys say that to them it is less
sensational to have sex with the condom on ... the same way as when one has
the foreskin intact ... unlike a circumcised man they don’t experience
maximum sensation” (from group discussion with secondary school girls).
Currently, approximately 4% of rural men in Mwanza Region are Muslim; most
Muslims live in roadside settlements. In urban areas, Islam has more
followers, and Islamic law necessitates that a male child be circumcised by
the 40th day after birth. Arab traders introduced Islam to this part of
Africa during the 19th century, mainly in trading centers. Circumcision
could be obtained from a ngariba—an Arab expert who provided circumcision
services for the Arab community. Later, circumcision services were also
provided by hospitals, which probably led to the disappearance of the
ngariba services in this area. Several Muslims in the group discussions and
in-depth interviews revealed that they were not circumcised. They provided
examples of how the practices of newly introduced religion are harmonized
with preexisting belief systems, and in some cases circumcision was not
considered compatible with their traditional religion (e.g., it provoked the
ancestral spirits). There is no Christian influence favoring circumcision
other than circumcision services, which may be provided by the church-owned
health facilities.
Discussion:
Our study shows that male circumcision has become more popular among a
traditionally noncircumcising tribe in northwest Tanzania where
approximately one in five men are now circumcised. In most African societies
where males are circumcised between the ages 6 and 15 years, the main reason
is ritual practice.3 Additional reasons (e.g., finding the circumcised penis
esthetic, that the practice enhances fertility or sexual pleasure) have also
been mentioned in a circumcising ethnic group in Nigeria.15 Most men in our
study were circumcised during late adolescence or in adulthood, mostly for
health reasons. Circumcision is thought to enhance penile hygiene, reduce
STD incidence among men, and shorten the duration or lessen the
infectiousness of STDs. In some instances, enhancement of sexual pleasure
was considered a secondary reason for male circumcision, in contrast with
findings of studies from western countries, which emphasize reduction in
sexual pleasure associated with removal of the sensitive foreskin. Few
respondents mentioned male circumcision as a method of STD treatment. There
was some anecdotal evidence of such a practice,6 but this does not appear to
be common.
How genuine is the increase in self-reported circumcision rates? Among men
who were asked twice about their circumcision status with 2 years between
questioning, there was considerable inconsistency. In the factory worker
cohort study, the self-reported circumcision status was validated against
subsequent physical examination in a 10% sample of the study population.6
Upon physical examination, 31% of men who reported circumcision during the
interview were not circumcised, and 6% of men who had reported not being
circumcised were circumcised. Therefore, in the factory population, the
actual prevalence of circumcision was lower than the reported rate (28%
versus 34%). If the same misclassification rates would apply to a rural area
with 10% of men circumcised, the effect would be the opposite—the “true”
circumcision rates would be 12%. Therefore, even though the
misclassification biases are not small, they do not refute our conclusion
that male circumcision has increased considerably among Sukuma men. In
analyses of the relation between male circumcision status and HIV,
misclassification may present a problem and weaken the association.
Is it likely that changes such as those observed among the Sukuma population
is or will occur elsewhere in Africa? In a homogenous noncircumcising
society, it seems less likely that male circumcision will be accepted by a
large part of the population. Sukuma society has been exposed to male
circumcision through the influence of Islam and the mixing of
noncircumcising and circumcising tribes. The nearest circumcising ethnic
groups are the smaller tribes of the Jita, Kwaya, Zanaki, Ikizu, and Kurya,
all living in Mara Region to the north of Mwanza Region.16 Within Mwanza
Region, no resident ethnic group is circumcising, and circumcision is not
traditionally practiced to the south (Nyamwezi) and west (Haya and Ha). The
growth of urban centers and the establishment of district capitals with
government representatives from all over the country has led to increased
mixing of circumcising and noncircumcising ethnic groups. For example, in a
factory population in Mwanza town, 33% of men were found to be of
circumcising ethnic groups. In fishing villages along the shores of Lake
Victoria, this figure was 11%, and 4% of participants in a large rural
survey were found to be of circumcising ethnic groups.6 The mix of ethnic
groups is most obvious in secondary schools, and has led to increasing
acceptance of male circumcision. The discussions and interviews with
schoolboys indicated positive attitude toward circumcision, linking it with
modernity and hygienic practices. Both young and adult men stated that it is
now difficult for a noncircumcised man to be accepted for sex by a woman
from an ethnic group that practices male circumcision.
How desirable is the change in male circumcision practices? Poor penile
hygiene, worsened by shortages of water and bathing facilities, is likely to
be common and may lead to infections. The effect of circumcision on HIV
transmission needs further study, but results increasingly suggest that male
circumcision status is an important cofactor.2,7,8,17 Male circumcision is
likely to lead to an improvement in penile hygiene and contribute to a
reduction in STDs, notably genital ulcers. No trials have been conducted to
show the effect of male circumcision on HIV incidence, though studies in
Kenya and Uganda suggested that a considerable proportion of men would want
to be circumcised if such services were free of charge in hospitals.10,11
This may also be the case among the Sukuma of Tanzania. The protective
effect of circumcision on the risk of HIV transmission, however, may be
smaller if circumcision is carried out at later age, as was suggested by the
results of a study in Uganda.18
Finally, health programs in Africa need to take into account the delicate
and ever-changing balance between traditional systems and modernizing
influences. The popularization of male circumcision among the Sukuma of
Tanzania shows that traditional health beliefs and practices may change
under influences caused by increased mobility of people (e.g., mixing of
ethnic groups in schools, urban areas) and not by health programs per se.
The increased mobility leads to more exposure to different health beliefs
and practices, and may change practices at a societal level. This change
should be taken into account in the design of health programs, and, in this
case, of HIV and STD prevention programs.
Reprint requests: Soori Nnko, TANESA Project, P.O. Box 434, Mwanza,
Tanzania.
Received for publication May 16, 2000, revised July 31, 2000, and accepted
July 31, 2000.
Male circumcision is becoming more popular in northwest Tanzania because of
the influence of mixing ethnic groups and religions, and is thought to
enhance penile hygiene and prevent sexually transmitted disease.
Sex Transm Dis 2001 April;28(4):214-218
Copyright © 2001 American Sexually Transmitted Disease Association. All
rights reserved
Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Male circumcision status is considered an important cofactor in
the spread of HIV and sexually transmitted disease. There is limited
evidence that male circumcision practices in Africa may be changing.
Goal: To assess the determinants of male circumcision status in a
traditionally noncircumcising ethnic group and to investigate the reasons
for increasing acceptance of circumcision.
RECENTLY, THERE HAS BEEN increasing interest in the practice of male
circumcision in Africa because of its association with HIV infection.
Several authors considered male circumcision an important explanation for
the uneven spread of HIV and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Initial evidence
was derived from macroanalyses of the geographic distribution of HIV
infection and male circumcision in Africa.1–3 Subsequently, studies of
patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and, to a lesser extent,
population-based studies have shown a relation between male circumcision
status and HIV prevalence.4–6 A recent review of 33 studies suggested that
male circumcision particularly protects against HIV among high-risk groups
in which genital ulcers and other STDs are driving the epidemic.7 Recent
results from a discordant couple study in Uganda showed a large protective
effect of male circumcision.8 In this context, an increasing number of
authors discuss the promotion of male circumcision as a HIV-preventive
measure.7,9,10
Male circumcision is widely practiced around the world, mostly for religious
or health reasons. In many parts of Africa, male circumcision practices are
linked to culture and religion and signify a transition from one social
status to another. Ethnographic data from Africa show marked regional
differences in male circumcision practices within the continent. A large
belt of noncircumcising tribes runs from southern Sudan through Uganda,
western Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, part of eastern Zaire, and western Tanzania
to Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, and southern Namibia.3,11 Most data
regarding circumcision practices have been collected several decades ago as
part of anthropologic studies of the colonial time (e.g., Murdock’s
Ethnographic Atlas).12 There are a few ethnic groups known to have
completely changed their male circumcision practices, such as the Zulu in
South Africa (in the 19th century, by order of their king) and the Akan (one
of the few noncircumcising groups of West Africa).3
The study was carried out among the Sukuma ethnic group in Mwanza Region,
northwest Tanzania. The Sukuma are the largest ethnic group in Tanzania and
constitute the majority of the population in Mwanza and Shinyanga Regions.
Traditionally, Sukuma do not practice male circumcision.
Table 1 presents the determinants of circumcision among men in the first
rural survey and in the urban factory cohort study. Many men were
circumcised in their late teens or early twenties. Among men 15 to 19 years,
only 10% were circumcised, compared with more than 20% of men 20 years and
older. The relatively late age at circumcision is also shown in data from
the male factory worker study and the second survey in the rural population,
in which men were asked to recall at what age they had been circumcised. The
mean age at circumcision was 17.4 years and 17.1 years among 329 Sukuma
factory workers and 544 rural residents, respectively
References
[Click here for reference links. (12 references linked.)]
Bongaarts J, Reining R, Way P, Conant F. The relationship between male
circumcision and HIV infection in African populations. AIDS 1989; 3:
373–377.
Moses S, Plummer A, Bradley JE, et al. The association between lack of male
circumcision and risk for HIV infection: a review of the epidemiological
data. Sex Transm Dis 1994; 21: 201–210.
Caldwell JC, Caldwell P. The neglect of an epidemiological explanation for
the distribution of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: exploring the male
circumcision hypothesis. Health Transition Rev 1994; 4 (suppl): 23–46.
Cameron DW, Simonsen JN, D’Costa LJ, et al. Female to male transmission of
human immunodeficiency virus type 1: risk factors for seroconversion in men.
Lancet 1989; 74: 368–73.
Moses S, Bradley JE, Nagelkerke NJD, et al. Geographical patterns of male
circumcision practice in Africa: association with HIV seroprevalence. Int J
Epidemiol 1990; 19: 693–697.
Urassa M, Todd J, Boerma JT, Hayes R, Isingo R. Male circumcision and
susceptibility to HIV infection among men in Tanzania. AIDS 1997; 11: 73–80.
O’Farrell N, Egger M. Circumcision in men and the prevention of HIV
infections: a ‘meta-analysis’ revisited. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11: 137–142.
Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Sewankambo N, et al. Viral load and heterosexual
transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type I. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:
921–929.
Bailey RC, Neema S, Otieno R. Sexual behaviors and other HIV risk factors in
circumcised and uncircumcised men in Uganda. J AIDS 1999; 22: 294–301.
Halperin DT, Bailey RC. Male circumcision and HIV infection: 10 years and
counting. Lancet 1999; 354: 1813–1815.
Conant FP. Regional HIV prevalence and ritual circumcision in Africa. Health
Transition Rev 1995; 5: 108–112.
Murdock GP. Ethnographic atlas: a summary. Ethnology 1967; 6: 109–236.
Senkoro KP, Boerma JT, Klokke AH, et al. HIV incidence and HIV associated
mortality among a cohort of factory workers in Tanzania, 1991–1996. J AIDS
2000; 23: 194–202.
Boerma JT, Urassa M, Senkoro K, Klokke A, Zaba B, Ng’weshemi JZL. Spread of
HIV infection in a rural area in Tanzania. AIDS 1999; 13: 1233–1240.
Myers RA, Omorodion FI, Isenalumhe AE, Akenzua GI. Circumcision: its nature
and practice among some ethnic groups in Southern Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 1985;
21: 581–588.
Dodge OG, Kaviti JN. Male circumcision among the peoples of East Africa and
the incidence of genital cancer. East Afr Med J 1965; 42: 98–105.
Moses S, Bailey RC, Ronald AR. Male circumcision: assessment of health risks
and benefits. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74: 368–373.
Kelly R, Kiwanuka N, Wawer MJ, et al. Age of male circumcision and risk of
prevalent HV infection in rural Uganda. AIDS 1999; 13: 399–405.
The studies were carried out in the context of the Tanzania-Netherlands
project to support AIDS control in Mwanza Region (TANESA), and were funded
by the Netherlands’ Minister for Development Cooperation.